The Liquid Metallic Hydrogen Solar Model
Also look at 5.8 solar wind and solar cycle#32.... about 12th paragraph, it says helium levels in the solar wind can vary substantially with activity blah blah blah
So if you read zarhkova paper,,,,, the magneto graphs you go over is what she is using for prediction. Dipole ,quadrupole. Look at the graph and she is basically using matrices or hamiltonians or lagrange mathmatics to PULL OUT THE CURVES, because it looks like noice,,,, but it aint, the sun is a perfect ocillator or close enough for government work lolol
Quote from greg on February 6, 2020, 12:46 amSo if you read zarhkova paper,,,,, the magneto graphs you go over is what she is using for prediction. Dipole ,quadrupole. Look at the graph and she is basically using matrices or hamiltonians or lagrange mathmatics to PULL OUT THE CURVES, because it looks like noice,,,, but it aint, the sun is a perfect ocillator or close enough for government work lolol
Zharkova is out of gas, busted, looking at one (of at least 6 more significant variables), and wrong. Zharkova is looking at TSI, total solar irradiance. I've been telling my actual friends to be prepared for her to be proven wrong shortly (during this CURRENT solar cycle 25).
Also, the Sun is not fundamentally electric . So be prepared for that also. You should be glad it's not (because an electric Sun would be extremely unstable, emit orders of magnitude more electromagnetic radiation, more protons...). This anode= the heliopause and cathode = solar surface is not how the Sun works at all. When people say 99.999% of the matter in the universe is plasma, they're wrong. The plasma everybody has a boner over is on the surface of stars, not in their interiors. Their interiors are made of condensed matter, not plasma. The observations don't lie and there are really bright objects all around us shouting- HERE'S HOW WE WORK! It's our job to listen and compose reasonable explanations for the observations.
What our job IS NOT is to come up with extremely dubious theories and then search the skies for 'evidence' of them. That's not science, and when the Electric Universe Cult does that- it's just as bad as mainstream lambda cold dark matter gravity models.
